WebJun 4, 2024 · Seven principles in the Kedar Nath Singh ruling specify situations in which the charge of sedition cannot be applied. * The expression “ ‘the Government established by law’ has to be distinguished from the persons for the time being engaged in carrying on the administration. ‘Government established by law’ is the visible symbol of the ... WebNov 11, 2015 · 1. Shreya Singhal v. Union Of India WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.167 OF 2012 Judgement on 24th March 2015 by Justice R.F. Nariman. 2. * * Two girls-Shaheen Dhada and Rinu Srinivasan, were arrested by the Mumbai police in 2012 for expressing their displeasure at a bandh called in the wake of Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackery’s death.
Explained: The Kedar Nath sedition ruling - The Indian …
WebAug 5, 2024 · By – Aditya Katayan In The Supreme Court of India Name of the Case Tarun Bharat Sangh, Alwar v. Union of India & Ors Citation (1993) INSC 209 Date of the Case April 8, 1993 Petitioner Tarun Bharat Sangh Respondent(s) Union of India Bench/Judges Justice B.P. Jeevan Reddy & Justice N. Venkatachala Statutes/Constitution Involved … WebMay 19, 2024 · During the course of the hearings before the apex court, Solicitor General for India Tushar Mehta submitted before the Bench of the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli that the five-judge Constitution Bench judgment in Kedar Nath Singh v. Union of India has stood the test of time, and that only a bench of … minimal manpower crossword clue
Shreya Singhal vs Union Of India (Case Study) - SlideShare
WebMay 19, 2024 · Presented a case analysis of Shayara Bano v. Union of India, AIR 2024 9 SCC 1 (SC), which is a landmark decision on the constitutional validity of “Talaq-e … WebMar 24, 2015 · The Supreme Court of India initially issued an interim measure in Singhal v. Union of India, (2013) 12 S.C.C. 73, prohibiting any arrest pursuant to Section 66A unless such arrest is approved by senior police officers. In the case in hand, the Court addressed the constitutionality of the provision. Webcourt in question. In the case of Dhina Singh v. Union Of India, It was held that this notice is for the benefit of the government or the public officer, it is the prerogative of the … most repeated pakstudy mcqs